Whistleblower Treated as ‘Complainer’ Receives Substantial Compensation

Whistleblowers perform a vital role in the public interest and managers who persist in viewing their activities merely as inconvenient belly-aching expose themselves to condemnation by Employment Tribunals (ETs). That was certainly so in the case of a warehouse worker whose health and safety…

Feb 09, 2022

Pexels tiger lily 4481323 1024x683

Whistleblowers perform a vital role in the public interest and managers who persist in viewing their activities merely as inconvenient belly-aching expose themselves to condemnation by Employment Tribunals (ETs). That was certainly so in the case of a warehouse worker whose health and safety concerns were ignored.

The man reported a number of health and safety issues to his managers. Amongst other things, he noticed that cardboard and pallets were being stored in a way that prevented access to fire extinguishers and fire exits, and that a safety switch on a conveyor belt was not working because it was blocked with a cable tie.

He said that his activities resulted in a witch-hunt against him. He was given unpleasant jobs to do, was three times denied promotion and was insulted and harassed by way of the warehouse’s public radio channel. He resigned after his mental health deteriorated to the point where he dreaded going to work and had suicidal thoughts. He later launched ET proceedings.

In ruling on the matter, the ET found that he was constructively dismissed. He was badly treated on a number of occasions in a manner that amounted to a fundamental breach of the relationship of trust and confidence that should be a feature of any employment relationship. The mistreatment had caused his resignation.

He reasonably believed that his concerns were justified and that he had raised them in the public interest. Managers, however, ignored his disclosures and marked him down as a complainer. The various detriments to which he was subjected were connected to his whistleblowing activities and his dismissal was thus automatically unfair. His former employer was ordered to pay him £20,959 in compensation, including £6,000 for injury to his feelings.

HGV Driver’s Resignation Defeats Unfair Dismissal Claim

An HGV driver’s unfair dismissal claim has been rejected after the Employment Tribunal (ET) found that his employment contract had already been brought to an end by his resignation. After he was observed to have veered while eating a sandwich when driving, the driver’s employer advised him of a disciplinary hearing to be held the following week. That weekend he gave a week’s notice of his resignation, as required by his employment contract. He attended the hearing, which took place the day…

Health and Safety – Spa Hotel Appeals Against Legionella Bans

It is hard to imagine circumstances that might outweigh the imperative of maintaining public health and safety. The point was made by the case of a spa hotel which had its pools and hot tubs placed off limits after a former guest was admitted to hospital suffering from Legionnaires’ disease. After the man was taken ill, the hotel’s manager agreed voluntarily to prohibit use of its showers, indoor hot tub and indoor swimming pool until water sample results were received. Public Health England…

Workplace Horseplay and Employers’ Responsibilities – Guideline Ruling

Irresponsible horseplay in the workplace can cause serious injury, but to what extent should employers be held indirectly – or vicariously – liable for such behaviour? The Court of Appeal considered that burning issue in a guideline case. A fitter was bending down to pick up a length of steel when a workmate placed two pellet targets on a bench close to his right ear. The workmate struck the targets with a hammer, causing a loud explosion. As a result, the fitter suffered noise-induced hearing…