Whistleblower Treated as ‘Complainer’ Receives Substantial Compensation

Whistleblowers perform a vital role in the public interest and managers who persist in viewing their activities merely as inconvenient belly-aching expose themselves to condemnation by Employment Tribunals (ETs). That was certainly so in the case of a warehouse worker whose health and safety…

Feb 09, 2022

Pexels tiger lily 4481323 1024x683

Whistleblowers perform a vital role in the public interest and managers who persist in viewing their activities merely as inconvenient belly-aching expose themselves to condemnation by Employment Tribunals (ETs). That was certainly so in the case of a warehouse worker whose health and safety concerns were ignored.

The man reported a number of health and safety issues to his managers. Amongst other things, he noticed that cardboard and pallets were being stored in a way that prevented access to fire extinguishers and fire exits, and that a safety switch on a conveyor belt was not working because it was blocked with a cable tie.

He said that his activities resulted in a witch-hunt against him. He was given unpleasant jobs to do, was three times denied promotion and was insulted and harassed by way of the warehouse’s public radio channel. He resigned after his mental health deteriorated to the point where he dreaded going to work and had suicidal thoughts. He later launched ET proceedings.

In ruling on the matter, the ET found that he was constructively dismissed. He was badly treated on a number of occasions in a manner that amounted to a fundamental breach of the relationship of trust and confidence that should be a feature of any employment relationship. The mistreatment had caused his resignation.

He reasonably believed that his concerns were justified and that he had raised them in the public interest. Managers, however, ignored his disclosures and marked him down as a complainer. The various detriments to which he was subjected were connected to his whistleblowing activities and his dismissal was thus automatically unfair. His former employer was ordered to pay him £20,959 in compensation, including £6,000 for injury to his feelings.

Leaky Victorian Drains Trigger Successful Unfair Dismissal Claim

It almost goes without saying that employers who fail to provide their staff with a safe working environment positively invite Employment Tribunal (ET) complaints. A case on point concerned an opticians’ shop that was afflicted by leaks and nasty smells arising from an antiquated drainage system. An optical consultant who worked in the shop suffered from multiple sclerosis. Leaks from the Victorian drains caused her particular anxiety because medical treatment she was undergoing suppressed her…

Court of Appeal Upholds Entitlements of Employee on Long-Term Sick Leave

Many employers offer their staff the benefit of insurance-backed income protection schemes that provide them with financial security in the event of long-term illness. The legal effect of one such scheme came under analysis by the Court of Appeal in a case concerning an engineer who had been on sick leave for well over a decade. The engineer went on sick leave in 2009, suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome, and had been off work continuously ever since. Throughout all but the first 13 weeks…

How to Conduct a Fair Redundancy Exercise – Guideline EAT Ruling

A redundancy process in which a decision to dismiss is effectively taken in advance of consulting an affected employee will almost never be fair. The point was made by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the case of a nurse who was selected for redundancy solely because her fixed-term contract was shortly due to expire. The nurse worked in a research unit that was losing money and needed to shed staff. She was selected for redundancy for no other reason than that her contract was coming up…