Leaky Victorian Drains Trigger Successful Unfair Dismissal Claim

It almost goes without saying that employers who fail to provide their staff with a safe working environment positively invite Employment Tribunal (ET) complaints. A case on point concerned an opticians’ shop that was afflicted by leaks and nasty smells arising from an antiquated drainage…

Oct 22, 2021

Harpreet singh xbphaw x0i0 unsplash 1024x683

It almost goes without saying that employers who fail to provide their staff with a safe working environment positively invite Employment Tribunal (ET) complaints. A case on point concerned an opticians’ shop that was afflicted by leaks and nasty smells arising from an antiquated drainage system.

An optical consultant who worked in the shop suffered from multiple sclerosis. Leaks from the Victorian drains caused her particular anxiety because medical treatment she was undergoing suppressed her immunity from disease. She ultimately tendered her resignation and lodged ET proceedings.

Upholding her constructive unfair dismissal claim, the ET found that the drainage problem, whilst not constant, was ongoing. It resulted in leaks, nasty odours and possibly fly infestations. It was simply unacceptable that the shop remained open on occasions when it was bereft of working or accessible toilet facilities.

In failing to take the drainage issue seriously, the employer exposed its staff to an unsafe working environment. Given the health-based nature of its business, it was surprising that there was no evidence that it sought to move the shop to alternative premises while the problem was resolved. It was understandable that the woman felt continuously anxious about her health and safety in the workplace.

She did not want her condition to prevent her from working and maintained as good an attendance record as possible. However, she had to take time off work for medical reasons and the ET found that the employer failed to properly manage her absences. Managers did not empathise with her appropriately or appreciate that, due to her condition, she was likely to feel anxious and vulnerable.

The final straw came in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic when a customer who was complaining of flu-like symptoms was permitted to attend an appointment at the shop. Although the shop’s manager was unaware of the customer’s symptoms, it was reasonable for the woman to conclude that she could not have confidence in management to keep her workplace safe.

The woman’s complaint that the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments to cater for her medical condition – which was agreed to be a disability – was also upheld. If not agreed, the amount of her compensation would be assessed at a further hearing.

Furlough Scheme Abuse Whistleblower Receives Substantial Compensation

Every right-thinking person would agree that workplace whistleblowers deserve not retaliation but praise. However, the opposite sadly happened in the case of a public-spirited factory worker who expressed deep ethical concern about his employer’s criminal abuse of the COVID-19 furlough scheme. The man, who had a vulnerable daughter at particular risk from COVID-19, complained to management that self-isolation rules were not being followed after one of his co-workers tested positive for the…

Are ‘Smart’ Motorways Safe? High Court Ruling Begs the Question

Are so called ‘smart’ motorways, which lack hard shoulders, safe? An answer to that question was implicitly begged by a High Court case concerning a catastrophic accident involving a minibus filled with university students, one of whom died. The university-owned minibus was returning from a sporting event along a stretch of smart motorway when it began to lose power. After a dashboard warning light came on, the driver pulled into an emergency refuge area (ERA). About 22 seconds later, he drove…

Engaging a Tradesman? Do You Understand Your Health and Safety Duties?

If a tradesman sustains injury whilst working on a client’s premises, should the client be liable to pay compensation? The High Court pondered that important issue in the case of a builder who fell through a barn roof, suffering catastrophic injuries. The builder, who was in his late 50s, was engaged by a farmer to replace the barn’s guttering. Working alongside his son, he sensibly installed crawler boards so as to spread his weight on the barn’s fragile roof. As his son passed sections of…