Taking On Staff? Doing So Prematurely Can Have Serious Consequences

Taking on staff is often a necessary precursor to setting up a new business. As an Employment Tribunal (ET) decision showed, however, entering into any form of binding employment relationship is a serious step and doing so prematurely can have grave financial consequences.

The case…

Mar 10, 2021

John cameron mkkhgxilvoc unsplash 1024x768

Taking on staff is often a necessary precursor to setting up a new business. As an Employment Tribunal (ET) decision showed, however, entering into any form of binding employment relationship is a serious step and doing so prematurely can have grave financial consequences.

The case concerned an entrepreneur who set up a security company with a view to providing lucrative services to a high net worth individual who intended to visit the UK. Two days after its incorporation, the company entered into an employment contract with an acquaintance of the entrepreneur. He was taken on as a trainee close protection driver at a gross salary of over £2,000 per week.

The high net worth individual, however, decided not to use the company’s services and its business never got off the ground. As a result, the employee had been offered no work and had not been paid. He complained to an ET that unlawful deductions had been made from his wages.

Upholding his claim, the ET noted that he had left his previous job in order to join the company. He had neither resigned nor been dismissed and therefore remained the company’s employee. The fact that he had done no actual work for the company did not affect his contractual entitlements. The company was ordered to pay him £44,352, that sum representing 22 weeks’ salary.

Uber Drivers Are Workers – Supreme Court Finally Settles the Argument

Tightly defined controls that online private hire vehicle operator Uber exerts over drivers who use its app proved decisive in the Supreme Court’s ruling that they are ‘workers’, as defined by the Employment Rights Act 1996, and are thus entitled to receive the National Minimum Wage, paid leave and other benefits. Uber has, without success, fought its way through the tribunal and court systems in an attempt to establish that its drivers are self-employed contractors, in business on their own…

Fear of COVID-19 is Not a Philosophical Belief – Employment Ruling

A fear of contracting COVID-19 or infecting others with the virus is both worthy of respect and readily understandable. However, an Employment Tribunal (ET) has ruled in a novel case that it does not amount to a philosophical belief. The case concerned a woman who said that her wages had been withheld after she declined to return to work in July 2020. She believed that the pandemic at that time continued to pose a serious and imminent health and safety risk. She was worried about contracting…

Disability Discrimination by Association – Guideline EAT Decision

It may sound surprising, but you need not necessarily be disabled in order to suffer disability discrimination. As one case showed, it is legally possible for a non-disabled employee to suffer discrimination by association with a disabled colleague. A sales manager was recruited by a company’s sales and marketing director, who subsequently became disabled due to cancer. After both men were dismissed, the manager launched proceedings, asserting that he had been subjected to direct disability…