Plagued by Former Employees Turned Competitors? See a Lawyer Today!

Many business owners lie awake at night worrying that senior employees may leave to set up rival operations, taking clients and confidential information with them. Such conduct is, however, highly likely to be unlawful and, as one case showed, specialist lawyers can very swiftly take steps to…

Mar 05, 2021

Scott graham oqmzwnd3thu unsplash 1024x683

Many business owners lie awake at night worrying that senior employees may leave to set up rival operations, taking clients and confidential information with them. Such conduct is, however, highly likely to be unlawful and, as one case showed, specialist lawyers can very swiftly take steps to nip it in the bud.

The case concerned a share purchase agreement (SPA), by which a consultancy group acquired the entire issued share capital of a rival company for over £6.4 million. As part of the deal, two of the company’s founders entered into service agreements and stayed on as executive directors.

The company launched proceedings after both men subsequently left its employ and incorporated a new business which operated in an identical field. It alleged that they had joined in a common design to injure its business by unlawful means. They were said to have induced three of the company’s former employees to breach their contracts and to have breached the terms of the SPA and the service agreements. The competitor was accused of inducing those breaches.

After a preliminary hearing, the High Court found that the company had established a powerful and compelling case that the competitor was involved in a major exercise designed to divert away its customers by illegal means. Although the two men had sought to distance themselves from any such activities, the Court noted that they were the competitor’s founding directors. There was a serious issue to be tried as to the true extent of their knowledge of what was going on.

The Court made orders requiring the men and the competitor to preserve evidence that might be relevant to the case and to deliver up any hard-copy documents in their possession, custody or control which belonged to the company or which contained information confidential to the company. Directions were given for a further hearing at which the company would seek more extensive relief.

Proving a Link Between Unfair Treatment and Discrimination Can Be Tough

It may be relatively straightforward to prove you have suffered unfair treatment at work, but establishing that such treatment results from discrimination can pose a far greater challenge. This was certainly so in an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) case concerning a forklift truck driver. The man launched proceedings following two fractious confrontations between him and colleagues in the car park of the premises where he worked for a logistics company. He alleged that he was falsely and…

£20 Million Settlement Achieved for Traumatised Grenfell Tower Firefighters

Personal injury claims brought by 114 firefighters who attended the Grenfell Tower fire have been settled for £20 million in the High Court. The claims were lodged for personal injury and loss caused by alleged negligence and breach of statutory duty. Amongst the defendants were the companies that made the combustible cladding for the building and designed and built the tower’s exterior refurbishment. Other defendants included the London Fire Commissioner and the Royal Borough of Kensington and…

Final Claims for Statutory Sick Pay Rebate Scheme

REMINDER: The Statutory Sick Pay Rebate Scheme closed on the 30th September 2021 and Companies have until the 31st December 2021 to submit any final claims, or to amend claims that have already been submitted.