Women are More Likely to Bear Childcare Responsibilities – That’s a Fact

Judges do not operate in a vacuum and are entitled to take the view that some facts are so obvious that there is no requirement to prove them. In an important ruling, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that that principle applies to the fact that women are more likely to bear childcare…

Aug 24, 2021

Kids coloring with mom 1024x685

Judges do not operate in a vacuum and are entitled to take the view that some facts are so obvious that there is no requirement to prove them. In an important ruling, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) found that that principle applies to the fact that women are more likely to bear childcare responsibilities than men.

The case involved a community nurse who was primary carer for her three children, two of them disabled. Due to her responsibilities as a mother, she worked only on Wednesdays and Thursdays. Her NHS trust employer introduced a flexible working regime that required her to work on weekends every so often. After she made it clear that she could not meet that requirement, she was dismissed.

Her complaints of unfair dismissal and indirect sex discrimination were subsequently rejected by an Employment Tribunal (ET) on the basis that the flexible working requirement was applied to all members of her nursing team, both male and female. There was no evidence that the requirement put female members of the team, as a group, at a particular disadvantage when compared to male colleagues.

In upholding her challenge to that outcome, the EAT found that the ET erred in limiting the pool for comparison to the team in which she worked. The flexible working requirement was applied to all community nurses across the trust and logic dictated that the appropriate pool was therefore all community nurses.

The ET was also wrong to reject the discrimination claim on the basis that there was no evidence of group disadvantage. It should have taken judicial notice of the fact that women are more likely than men to have childcare responsibilities and are thus less likely to be able to accommodate certain working patterns. The case was sent back to the same ET for reconsideration in the light of the EAT’s ruling.

Man Who Worked for Membership Association Was an Employee

The Employment Tribunal (ET) has ruled that a man who worked for a membership association which acted on behalf of free-range egg producers was an employee rather than a self-employed contractor. The man began working for the association in 2011 as Policy Director, going on to become Chief Executive in 2016. He was required to work a set number of days per week and invoiced the association monthly for the work he had performed, plus travel and accommodation expenses. In March 2023 he was given…

Plagued by Former Employees Turned Competitors? See a Lawyer Today!

Many business owners lie awake at night worrying that senior employees may leave to set up rival operations, taking clients and confidential information with them. Such conduct is, however, highly likely to be unlawful and, as one case showed, specialist lawyers can very swiftly take steps to nip it in the bud. The case concerned a share purchase agreement (SPA), by which a consultancy group acquired the entire issued share capital of a rival company for over £6.4 million. As part of the deal,…

Disability Discrimination – Diabetic Cake Shop Worker Compensated

Discrimination against disabled employees is a social evil with which Employment Tribunals (ETs) will have no truck. In one case, a cake shop worker who was dismissed because of her diabetes was awarded thousands of pounds in compensation. The woman’s condition meant that, without daily insulin injections, she would suffer a hypoglycaemic episode and fall into a coma. At the date of her dismissal, she was in stage B renal failure. In sacking her by text, her manager expressed the view that she…