Woman Sacked During Difficult Pregnancy Receives Just Compensation

Dismissing an employee for being pregnant may seem extraordinary in this day and age but it still happens far too often. In a case on point, a shop assistant who was viewed as a malingerer by her employer during her complicated pregnancy was awarded substantial compensation by an Employment…

Jan 04, 2022

Mother and father smiling down on their newborn baby 1024x683

Dismissing an employee for being pregnant may seem extraordinary in this day and age but it still happens far too often. In a case on point, a shop assistant who was viewed as a malingerer by her employer during her complicated pregnancy was awarded substantial compensation by an Employment Tribunal (ET).

The woman was on sick leave, having been advised by her GP that she should avoid bending and lifting, when she was taken aback to receive her P45. She launched ET proceedings on the basis that her dismissal was automatically unfair and that she had been subjected to unfavourable treatment because of her pregnancy.

In upholding both complaints, the ET noted her bosses’ evidence that they did not believe the GP’s certification that she was unfit for work. Instead, they thought that she was using her pregnancy as an excuse to get out of doing her job and that she was lying back and taking the money when she should have been at work.

The ET accepted her husband’s evidence that, when he presented a sick note at her workplace, one of her managers delivered an ultimatum that she would be dismissed if she did not return to work forthwith. Her employer had produced no evidence that stacked up that she was a malingerer or taking sick leave on a false premise. It followed that her dismissal was because of her pregnancy.

Turning to the valuation of her claim, the ET found that she had suffered no loss of earnings. It noted that she had belatedly received maternity pay from the employer and that there was abundant suitable work available in the relevant area. She was, however, awarded £10,000 in compensation for injury to her feelings and £525.40 in respect of the employer’s failure to provide her with written particulars of her employment.

Racial Harassment – Black Nurse Advised to ‘Bleach Her Skin White’

Insensitive race-related comments in the workplace may not be intended to cause distress, but they can nevertheless amount to racial harassment. An Employment Tribunal (ET) made that point in the case of a black nurse who was told that she needed to bleach her skin white so that patients would be nice to her. The agency nurse worked in the challenging environment of an immigration removal centre. After she was racially abused by a detainee, a colleague told her: ‘You need to get a pool of…

Disability Discrimination and Hypothetical Comparators – Guideline Ruling

Workplace disability discrimination claims often hinge on arguments that a disabled person was treated less favourably than a hypothetical comparator. As a guideline Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision showed, the circumstances that are imputed to such a comparator are, in many cases, of decisive importance. The case concerned a warehouse operative who was disabled by degenerative disc disease in her lower back. She was in near-constant pain and could not bend, walk or sit for more than…

Intelligent and High-Achieving Dyslexic People May Still Be Disabled in Law

Dyslexic people may be both highly intelligent and high-achieving but still be disabled in the legal sense of the word. An Employment Tribunal (ET) made that point in a case concerning a worker whose difficulties were such that she could not recall the last time she managed to finish a book. The woman lodged a disability discrimination complaint against her former employer, a university students’ union. To succeed in her claim, she first had to establish that she was disabled within the meaning…