Woman Sacked During Difficult Pregnancy Receives Just Compensation

Dismissing an employee for being pregnant may seem extraordinary in this day and age but it still happens far too often. In a case on point, a shop assistant who was viewed as a malingerer by her employer during her complicated pregnancy was awarded substantial compensation by an Employment…

Jan 04, 2022

Mother and father smiling down on their newborn baby 1024x683

Dismissing an employee for being pregnant may seem extraordinary in this day and age but it still happens far too often. In a case on point, a shop assistant who was viewed as a malingerer by her employer during her complicated pregnancy was awarded substantial compensation by an Employment Tribunal (ET).

The woman was on sick leave, having been advised by her GP that she should avoid bending and lifting, when she was taken aback to receive her P45. She launched ET proceedings on the basis that her dismissal was automatically unfair and that she had been subjected to unfavourable treatment because of her pregnancy.

In upholding both complaints, the ET noted her bosses’ evidence that they did not believe the GP’s certification that she was unfit for work. Instead, they thought that she was using her pregnancy as an excuse to get out of doing her job and that she was lying back and taking the money when she should have been at work.

The ET accepted her husband’s evidence that, when he presented a sick note at her workplace, one of her managers delivered an ultimatum that she would be dismissed if she did not return to work forthwith. Her employer had produced no evidence that stacked up that she was a malingerer or taking sick leave on a false premise. It followed that her dismissal was because of her pregnancy.

Turning to the valuation of her claim, the ET found that she had suffered no loss of earnings. It noted that she had belatedly received maternity pay from the employer and that there was abundant suitable work available in the relevant area. She was, however, awarded £10,000 in compensation for injury to her feelings and £525.40 in respect of the employer’s failure to provide her with written particulars of her employment.

‘Long Covid’ Recognised as a Disability in Important Employment Ruling

Following recovery from the immediate effects of COVID-19, a substantial number of people have gone on to suffer from a phenomenon commonly known as ‘long Covid’. In an important ruling, an Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the condition is capable of amounting to a disability within the meaning of Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010. The case concerned a charity worker who initially suffered mild, flu-like symptoms after contracting the virus. At the end of his isolation period, however, he…

Company Directors – You Need to Act to Secure Your Employment Rights

Company directors with imperfect knowledge of employment law all too often fail to confer upon themselves the basic legal protections to which even their most junior members of staff are entitled. In a case on point, a businessman found himself in a very weak position following his removal from the company he co-founded. The man was a 45 per cent shareholder and director of the company, which thrived in its early days, employing about 80 staff and turning over around £1.8 million. As its…

Discriminatory Treatment Can Result in Costly Damage to Mental Health

Failing to take appropriate care when it comes to the mental health of employees can not only result in falling foul of employment law; it also comes with a risk of personal injury being inflicted. This was evidenced in an Employment Tribunal (ET) case brought by a woman whose mental health was broken down by the discriminatory treatment she endured from her employer. The woman was employed by a barrister, variously as a virtual legal assistant, personal assistant and office manager, for a…