Woman Sacked During Difficult Pregnancy Receives Just Compensation

Dismissing an employee for being pregnant may seem extraordinary in this day and age but it still happens far too often. In a case on point, a shop assistant who was viewed as a malingerer by her employer during her complicated pregnancy was awarded substantial compensation by an Employment…

Jan 04, 2022

Mother and father smiling down on their newborn baby 1024x683

Dismissing an employee for being pregnant may seem extraordinary in this day and age but it still happens far too often. In a case on point, a shop assistant who was viewed as a malingerer by her employer during her complicated pregnancy was awarded substantial compensation by an Employment Tribunal (ET).

The woman was on sick leave, having been advised by her GP that she should avoid bending and lifting, when she was taken aback to receive her P45. She launched ET proceedings on the basis that her dismissal was automatically unfair and that she had been subjected to unfavourable treatment because of her pregnancy.

In upholding both complaints, the ET noted her bosses’ evidence that they did not believe the GP’s certification that she was unfit for work. Instead, they thought that she was using her pregnancy as an excuse to get out of doing her job and that she was lying back and taking the money when she should have been at work.

The ET accepted her husband’s evidence that, when he presented a sick note at her workplace, one of her managers delivered an ultimatum that she would be dismissed if she did not return to work forthwith. Her employer had produced no evidence that stacked up that she was a malingerer or taking sick leave on a false premise. It followed that her dismissal was because of her pregnancy.

Turning to the valuation of her claim, the ET found that she had suffered no loss of earnings. It noted that she had belatedly received maternity pay from the employer and that there was abundant suitable work available in the relevant area. She was, however, awarded £10,000 in compensation for injury to her feelings and £525.40 in respect of the employer’s failure to provide her with written particulars of her employment.

Engaging a Tradesman? Do You Understand Your Health and Safety Duties?

If a tradesman sustains injury whilst working on a client’s premises, should the client be liable to pay compensation? The High Court pondered that important issue in the case of a builder who fell through a barn roof, suffering catastrophic injuries. The builder, who was in his late 50s, was engaged by a farmer to replace the barn’s guttering. Working alongside his son, he sensibly installed crawler boards so as to spread his weight on the barn’s fragile roof. As his son passed sections of…

Right to Disconnect

Article from the Financial News - Friday August 27th 2021 When the pandemic struck, many businesses were forced to remove staff from the office and set them up at home at short notice. In the past 17 months, businesses have worked effectively with staff working from home. Productivity has increased, and staff have found that a more flexible working pattern has enabled a better work-life balance for many. Now that home schooling has become a distant memory, we hear that parents, grandparents and…

Agency Workers Have No Right to Apply for Vacant Permanent Positions

Agency workers have a right to be informed by those who hire them of permanent positions that become vacant – but are they also entitled to apply for such posts? Following an important test case, the Court of Appeal has answered that question decisively in the negative. The case concerned a worker who was employed by an agency that was owned by, and provided staff exclusively to, Royal Mail in order to enable the latter to react to fluctuations in demand for labour. When permanent positions…