‘Long Covid’ Recognised as a Disability in Important Employment Ruling

Following recovery from the immediate effects of COVID-19, a substantial number of people have gone on to suffer from a phenomenon commonly known as ‘long Covid’. In an important ruling, an Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the condition is capable of amounting to a disability within the…

Jun 17, 2022

Pexels julia m cameron 6995179 1024x683

Following recovery from the immediate effects of COVID-19, a substantial number of people have gone on to suffer from a phenomenon commonly known as ‘long Covid’. In an important ruling, an Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the condition is capable of amounting to a disability within the meaning of Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.

The case concerned a charity worker who initially suffered mild, flu-like symptoms after contracting the virus. At the end of his isolation period, however, he continued to suffer from extreme fatigue, joint pain, lack of mobility, sleeplessness and general lack of energy. After he was off sick for some months, his employer dismissed him, with regret, on the basis that he remained too ill to return to work.

He subsequently launched ET proceedings alleging, amongst other things, disability discrimination. The question of whether he was a disabled person within the meaning of Section 6 was considered as a preliminary issue.

Ruling in his favour on the point, the ET found him to be a credible witness. He said that the condition left him so exhausted after such mundane activities as showering and getting dressed that he needed to lie down. He had difficulty walking to his local shop to buy a newspaper and his concentration wavered to the extent that he struggled to read a book or watch TV without drifting off.

The condition had an adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day tasks. That effect was substantial in the sense of being more than minor or trivial. It was also long term in that it was likely to persist for a period of 12 months or more. The ET’s ruling opened the way for him to pursue his claim to a full hearing.

Health and Safety Fines Are Meant to Hurt – Court of Appeal Ruling

Financial penalties imposed on employers for health and safety breaches are meant to hurt and that is why the scale of their business is highly relevant when it comes to sentencing. In a case on point, a company with an annual turnover of about £1.6 billion was fined £640,000 following a factory floor accident. One of the company’s workers was monitoring the operation of a conveyor belt that kept slipping. That part of the belt was unguarded. He said that a cloth he was holding was dragged into…

Locum Consultant Not Entitled to Permanent Contract

Under Regulation 8 of the Fixed-term Employees (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2002, employees who have worked continuously for four years or more under a series of fixed-term contracts automatically become permanent employees unless the renewal of their employment on a fixed-term contract was objectively justified. Recently, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) considered whether such justification applied in the case of a locum consultant. The consultant was employed by…

Lost Your Job Due to the Pandemic? You May Have Been Unfairly Dismissed

If you are amongst the cohort of workers who have been made redundant in the wake of the pandemic and feel that you have been treated unfairly, you should contact a solicitor without delay. In one case, a bar manager who was sacked without notice received thousands of pounds in compensation. After several months on furlough, the 58-year-old man, who had been employed at a hotel for six years, was asked to return to work to prepare for reopening. A few weeks later, however, he received a letter…