‘Long Covid’ Recognised as a Disability in Important Employment Ruling

Following recovery from the immediate effects of COVID-19, a substantial number of people have gone on to suffer from a phenomenon commonly known as ‘long Covid’. In an important ruling, an Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the condition is capable of amounting to a disability within the…

Jun 17, 2022

Pexels julia m cameron 6995179 1024x683

Following recovery from the immediate effects of COVID-19, a substantial number of people have gone on to suffer from a phenomenon commonly known as ‘long Covid’. In an important ruling, an Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the condition is capable of amounting to a disability within the meaning of Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.

The case concerned a charity worker who initially suffered mild, flu-like symptoms after contracting the virus. At the end of his isolation period, however, he continued to suffer from extreme fatigue, joint pain, lack of mobility, sleeplessness and general lack of energy. After he was off sick for some months, his employer dismissed him, with regret, on the basis that he remained too ill to return to work.

He subsequently launched ET proceedings alleging, amongst other things, disability discrimination. The question of whether he was a disabled person within the meaning of Section 6 was considered as a preliminary issue.

Ruling in his favour on the point, the ET found him to be a credible witness. He said that the condition left him so exhausted after such mundane activities as showering and getting dressed that he needed to lie down. He had difficulty walking to his local shop to buy a newspaper and his concentration wavered to the extent that he struggled to read a book or watch TV without drifting off.

The condition had an adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day tasks. That effect was substantial in the sense of being more than minor or trivial. It was also long term in that it was likely to persist for a period of 12 months or more. The ET’s ruling opened the way for him to pursue his claim to a full hearing.

High Court Delves into Social History to Resolve Widow’s Asbestos Claim

Many people are still being carried off by merciless cancer due to asbestos exposure in the dim and distant past. As a High Court ruling showed, it is the very passage of time that makes it so hard for their loved ones to obtain compensation. The case concerned a former plasterer who died, aged 72, from mesothelioma – an incurable form of cancer that commonly takes decades to develop and can be caused by breathing in a single asbestos fibre. His widow launched a personal injury claim against a…

COVID-19 Lockdowns No Excuse for Sub-Standard Redundancy Processes

The COVID-19 lockdowns plunged thousands of businesses into dire financial straits but, as an Employment Tribunal (ET) ruling showed, the unprecedented crisis in no way relieved hard-pressed employers of their legal obligation to manage redundancy processes openly and fairly. The case concerned a fitter/welder who was on furlough when made redundant by a small engineering company. The pandemic had a catastrophic impact on the company’s business – reducing its turnover from £11 million to £5…

Woman Sacked During Difficult Pregnancy Receives Just Compensation

Dismissing an employee for being pregnant may seem extraordinary in this day and age but it still happens far too often. In a case on point, a shop assistant who was viewed as a malingerer by her employer during her complicated pregnancy was awarded substantial compensation by an Employment Tribunal (ET). The woman was on sick leave, having been advised by her GP that she should avoid bending and lifting, when she was taken aback to receive her P45. She launched ET proceedings on the basis that…