‘Long Covid’ Recognised as a Disability in Important Employment Ruling

Following recovery from the immediate effects of COVID-19, a substantial number of people have gone on to suffer from a phenomenon commonly known as ‘long Covid’. In an important ruling, an Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the condition is capable of amounting to a disability within the…

Jun 17, 2022

Pexels julia m cameron 6995179 1024x683

Following recovery from the immediate effects of COVID-19, a substantial number of people have gone on to suffer from a phenomenon commonly known as ‘long Covid’. In an important ruling, an Employment Tribunal (ET) found that the condition is capable of amounting to a disability within the meaning of Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010.

The case concerned a charity worker who initially suffered mild, flu-like symptoms after contracting the virus. At the end of his isolation period, however, he continued to suffer from extreme fatigue, joint pain, lack of mobility, sleeplessness and general lack of energy. After he was off sick for some months, his employer dismissed him, with regret, on the basis that he remained too ill to return to work.

He subsequently launched ET proceedings alleging, amongst other things, disability discrimination. The question of whether he was a disabled person within the meaning of Section 6 was considered as a preliminary issue.

Ruling in his favour on the point, the ET found him to be a credible witness. He said that the condition left him so exhausted after such mundane activities as showering and getting dressed that he needed to lie down. He had difficulty walking to his local shop to buy a newspaper and his concentration wavered to the extent that he struggled to read a book or watch TV without drifting off.

The condition had an adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day tasks. That effect was substantial in the sense of being more than minor or trivial. It was also long term in that it was likely to persist for a period of 12 months or more. The ET’s ruling opened the way for him to pursue his claim to a full hearing.

Employee Prey to Paranoid Delusions ‘Not Disabled’, Court of Appeal Rules

The statutory definition of ‘disability’ came under close Court of Appeal analysis in an employment case concerning a sales executive plagued by paranoid delusions that he was being followed and constantly monitored by a malign gang of Russians. Following a relationship with a Ukrainian woman, the man developed a belief that he was being tracked in person and in the digital world. He installed CCTV at his home and was nervous about communications technology. He changed his email address at…

Man Who Worked for Membership Association Was an Employee

The Employment Tribunal (ET) has ruled that a man who worked for a membership association which acted on behalf of free-range egg producers was an employee rather than a self-employed contractor. The man began working for the association in 2011 as Policy Director, going on to become Chief Executive in 2016. He was required to work a set number of days per week and invoiced the association monthly for the work he had performed, plus travel and accommodation expenses. In March 2023 he was given…

Woman Sacked During Difficult Pregnancy Receives Just Compensation

Dismissing an employee for being pregnant may seem extraordinary in this day and age but it still happens far too often. In a case on point, a shop assistant who was viewed as a malingerer by her employer during her complicated pregnancy was awarded substantial compensation by an Employment Tribunal (ET). The woman was on sick leave, having been advised by her GP that she should avoid bending and lifting, when she was taken aback to receive her P45. She launched ET proceedings on the basis that…