Skiing Company Fined After Boy’s Tragic Death at Birthday Party

An indoor skiing company has received a £100,000 fine following an accident in which a 12-year-old boy died.

The boy was at a tobogganing party to celebrate a friend’s birthday. He was descending the main ski slope on a toboggan when it ran into the back of a member of staff who was…

Apr 17, 2025

Pexels zszen 12165452 1024x682

An indoor skiing company has received a £100,000 fine following an accident in which a 12-year-old boy died.

The boy was at a tobogganing party to celebrate a friend’s birthday. He was descending the main ski slope on a toboggan when it ran into the back of a member of staff who was conducting a slope walk. The member of staff fell backwards onto the boy, who tragically died at the scene from head injuries.

An investigation by the Health and Safety Executive found that the company had failed to ensure the safety of its customers while they were tobogganing at the venue. It did not have a suitable and sufficient risk assessment for tobogganing activities and had not fully considered all persons likely to be on the slope during tobogganing. As a result, there was no safe system of work, information, instruction, training or supervision to manage the risk of collisions between toboggans and pedestrians.

The company pleaded guilty to breaching Section 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. It was fined £100,000 and ordered to pay costs of £14,534.

Man Who Worked for Membership Association Was an Employee

The Employment Tribunal (ET) has ruled that a man who worked for a membership association which acted on behalf of free-range egg producers was an employee rather than a self-employed contractor. The man began working for the association in 2011 as Policy Director, going on to become Chief Executive in 2016. He was required to work a set number of days per week and invoiced the association monthly for the work he had performed, plus travel and accommodation expenses. In March 2023 he was given…

Workplace Banter May Be Fine, But Not If it Tips Over Into Harassment

A certain amount of foul-mouthed banter is only to be expected in a robust working environment. As an Employment Tribunal (ET) ruling showed, however, employers who allow it to tip over into hostile and discriminatory abuse are likely to pay a high financial and reputational price. The case concerned a white worker, aged in his early 50s, who was employed by a tyre recycling company. He worked as part of a small team in which white people were in a minority. He said that a younger black…

Employed or Self-Employed? The Issue Can Present a Moving Target

The question of whether an individual is an employee or self-employed is highly fact sensitive and can, over time, present a moving target. That was certainly so in the case of a car body paintwork sprayer who, after setting up in business on his own account, eventually came to have only one customer. The man was the sole proprietor of a business that initially had three customers. He at first performed work for a vehicle sales company on three days a week, leaving time for him to serve his…