Proposed Changes to Employment Law Outlined

As part of the legislative programme set out in the King’s Speech, the government has outlined changes to be included in the Employment Rights Bill, which is set to be introduced within the first 100 days of the new parliament.

Proposed changes include:

  • Banning exploitative…

    Jul 19, 2024

Pexels olly 3760069 1024x683

As part of the legislative programme set out in the King’s Speech, the government has outlined changes to be included in the Employment Rights Bill, which is set to be introduced within the first 100 days of the new parliament.

Proposed changes include:

  • Banning exploitative zero-hours contracts. Workers will have a right to a contract that reflects the hours they regularly work in practice, ensuring all jobs provide a baseline level of security and predictability. It is also proposed that workers should receive reasonable notice of shift changes, and appropriate compensation for cancelled or curtailed shifts.
  • Making the right to Statutory Sick Pay (SSP), parental leave and protection from unfair dismissal available from the first day for all workers. The lower earnings limit for entitlement to SSP will also be removed. Employers will still be able to operate probationary periods when taking on new staff.
  • Making flexible working the default from the first day for all workers.
  • Making it unlawful to dismiss women who have had a baby for six months after their return to work, except in specific circumstances.

The government also intends to remove unnecessary restrictions on trade union activity and ensure industrial relations are based around good faith negotiation and bargaining. The process of statutory recognition of trade unions is to be simplified, and a regulated route introduced to ensure workers and union members have a reasonable right to access a union within workplaces.

Parcel Delivery Franchisees ‘Self-Employed’ – Guideline EAT Ruling

A right to substitute someone else to perform your work is perhaps the most powerful indicator that you are self-employed. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) made that point in finding that franchisees engaged by a parcel delivery company enjoyed neither the protected status of an employee nor that of a worker. The case concerned two men who entered into standard-form franchise agreements whereby they were required to provide a vehicle and driver to make collections and deliveries for the…

Employee Prey to Paranoid Delusions ‘Not Disabled’, Court of Appeal Rules

The statutory definition of ‘disability’ came under close Court of Appeal analysis in an employment case concerning a sales executive plagued by paranoid delusions that he was being followed and constantly monitored by a malign gang of Russians. Following a relationship with a Ukrainian woman, the man developed a belief that he was being tracked in person and in the digital world. He installed CCTV at his home and was nervous about communications technology. He changed his email address at…

Whistleblowing and the Need to Prove a Causal Link – Guideline Ruling

In order to succeed in a workplace whistleblowing claim, it is not enough merely to prove that you have made a protected disclosure. As one case showed, it is also necessary to establish a causal link between the disclosure and any detrimental treatment to which you have been subjected. The case involved a senior employee in a bank’s audit department. In a draft report, she expressed concerns about the bank’s risk exposure arising from a certain legal agreement. There was no dispute that she…