Proposed Changes to Employment Law Outlined

As part of the legislative programme set out in the King’s Speech, the government has outlined changes to be included in the Employment Rights Bill, which is set to be introduced within the first 100 days of the new parliament.

Proposed changes include:

  • Banning exploitative…

    Jul 19, 2024

Pexels olly 3760069 1024x683

As part of the legislative programme set out in the King’s Speech, the government has outlined changes to be included in the Employment Rights Bill, which is set to be introduced within the first 100 days of the new parliament.

Proposed changes include:

  • Banning exploitative zero-hours contracts. Workers will have a right to a contract that reflects the hours they regularly work in practice, ensuring all jobs provide a baseline level of security and predictability. It is also proposed that workers should receive reasonable notice of shift changes, and appropriate compensation for cancelled or curtailed shifts.
  • Making the right to Statutory Sick Pay (SSP), parental leave and protection from unfair dismissal available from the first day for all workers. The lower earnings limit for entitlement to SSP will also be removed. Employers will still be able to operate probationary periods when taking on new staff.
  • Making flexible working the default from the first day for all workers.
  • Making it unlawful to dismiss women who have had a baby for six months after their return to work, except in specific circumstances.

The government also intends to remove unnecessary restrictions on trade union activity and ensure industrial relations are based around good faith negotiation and bargaining. The process of statutory recognition of trade unions is to be simplified, and a regulated route introduced to ensure workers and union members have a reasonable right to access a union within workplaces.

Parcel Delivery Franchisees ‘Self-Employed’ – Guideline EAT Ruling

A right to substitute someone else to perform your work is perhaps the most powerful indicator that you are self-employed. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) made that point in finding that franchisees engaged by a parcel delivery company enjoyed neither the protected status of an employee nor that of a worker. The case concerned two men who entered into standard-form franchise agreements whereby they were required to provide a vehicle and driver to make collections and deliveries for the…

Providing Your Services Via a Company May Not Always Be a Good Idea

There can be advantages, both in terms of flexibility and tax efficiency, in providing your services via a private company. However, as an Employment Tribunal (ET) ruling showed, such arrangements may also have the less desirable effect of stripping you of any employment rights you might otherwise have had. A nurse who worked part time at a care home launched ET proceedings against its owner, alleging unfair constructive dismissal and that she had been subjected to racial discrimination and…

Employment Judge Embarked on ‘Frolic of his Own’ – EAT Ruling

Employment judges may reconsider their initial conclusions on a case, but that does not give them licence to embark on a wholesale change of mind on the basis of arguments that have not been presented to them. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) made that point in finding that an employment judge went on a frolic of his own. The case concerned a senior employee of a global company who was seconded on a short-term basis to run its operations in Canada. After his commission payments – which in…