Minimally Conscious Accident Victim Gets Seven-Figure Compensation

Accidents at work can have devastating consequences and it is very often true that no amount of money can ever make up for the pain and suffering involved. A case concerning a man in a minimally conscious state showed, however, that specialist lawyers can at least help to soften the…

Dec 16, 2021

Boxes on warehouse shelves 683x1024

Accidents at work can have devastating consequences and it is very often true that no amount of money can ever make up for the pain and suffering involved. A case concerning a man in a minimally conscious state showed, however, that specialist lawyers can at least help to soften the blow.

The middle-aged man was working as acting foreman for a manufacturing company when the accident occurred. He was helping out short-handed contractors in the factory where he was employed when he fell from height. The precise circumstances of the accident remained unclear, but he had received no training whatsoever in working high up. He sustained catastrophic head injuries and had never regained consciousness.

His condition was closely aligned to a persistent vegetative state but he had retained some level of minimal consciousness. Cared for in a nursing home, he responded to contact with his wife and family. Experts were of the view that his condition would not improve and that his life expectancy was relatively short. His wife, however, firmly believed that he would get better and that he would live for many more years.

After proceedings were brought against the contractors and his employer at the time, primary liability for the accident was acknowledged. The value of his claim was disputed and it was argued that he was in part responsible for his own misfortune. His legal team, however, managed to cut through those difficult issues by negotiating a £1,050,000 lump-sum settlement of his claim.

Approving the settlement, the High Court noted that the money would be used to top up his NHS-funded care regime. The accident was a tragedy for him and his family and the Court was moved by the great difficulties his wife had faced in visiting him and assisting in his care during the COVID-19 pandemic. All involved in the case hoped that she was right in her conviction that his condition would improve. Her care for him since the accident had been quite remarkable.

HGV Driver’s Resignation Defeats Unfair Dismissal Claim

An HGV driver’s unfair dismissal claim has been rejected after the Employment Tribunal (ET) found that his employment contract had already been brought to an end by his resignation. After he was observed to have veered while eating a sandwich when driving, the driver’s employer advised him of a disciplinary hearing to be held the following week. That weekend he gave a week’s notice of his resignation, as required by his employment contract. He attended the hearing, which took place the day…

Workplace Banter May Be Fine, But Not If it Tips Over Into Harassment

A certain amount of foul-mouthed banter is only to be expected in a robust working environment. As an Employment Tribunal (ET) ruling showed, however, employers who allow it to tip over into hostile and discriminatory abuse are likely to pay a high financial and reputational price. The case concerned a white worker, aged in his early 50s, who was employed by a tyre recycling company. He worked as part of a small team in which white people were in a minority. He said that a younger black…

Availability of Furlough Scheme Rendered Redundancy Unreasonable

A great many businesses were plunged into grave financial difficulties by the COVID-19 pandemic, but was it reasonable to make employees redundant at a time when the furlough scheme provided a less draconian option? An Employment Tribunal (ET) considered that issue in a ground-breaking case. A woman who was employed as a practice manager by a consultant surgeon was dismissed after the pandemic caused a downturn in the practice’s financial position. After she launched proceedings, an ET found…