In Employment Law Terms, Asperger’s Syndrome Can Be a Disability

A great many employers would agree that thinking differently is a positive advantage to those with Asperger’s syndrome and that they have much of value to contribute to the workplace. However, as one case showed, the condition may nevertheless be classified as a disability in employment law…

Nov 28, 2022

Julian hochgesang dkn8 zpibwo unsplash 1024x683

A great many employers would agree that thinking differently is a positive advantage to those with Asperger’s syndrome and that they have much of value to contribute to the workplace. However, as one case showed, the condition may nevertheless be classified as a disability in employment law terms.

After a man with a longstanding diagnosis of Asperger’s syndrome lodged an Employment Tribunal (ET) complaint against his telecommunications company employer, the question of whether he was disabled, within the meaning of Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, was considered as a preliminary issue.

Ruling on the matter, the ET noted that the man’s social interaction skills are affected by his condition. He has particular difficulty when meeting new people and his blunt and direct manner of speech can be misinterpreted as rudeness. His thinking, logic and decision-making skills are also affected and can make him appear stubborn, bringing him into conflict with others.

He further suffers anxiety and sleeplessness and can be intolerant to some sensory experiences, including certain noises or bright lights. Overall, the ET was satisfied that his condition has a substantial impact on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The statutory criteria for a finding of disability were therefore met.

Employment Tribunals Can Spot a Sham Redundancy When They See One

It can be hard to distinguish an unfair dismissal from a genuine redundancy process. As was shown by the case of a property manager who found himself on the receiving end of his boss’s unjustified pique, however, Employment Tribunals (ETs) tend to know a sham when they see one. The founder of the business for which the man worked had taken strongly against him. During a recorded meeting, she made a number of offensive remarks about him in his absence. After he launched proceedings, an ET found…

Disability Discrimination and Hypothetical Comparators – Guideline Ruling

Workplace disability discrimination claims often hinge on arguments that a disabled person was treated less favourably than a hypothetical comparator. As a guideline Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision showed, the circumstances that are imputed to such a comparator are, in many cases, of decisive importance. The case concerned a warehouse operative who was disabled by degenerative disc disease in her lower back. She was in near-constant pain and could not bend, walk or sit for more than…

Injured Fairground Worker Succeeds in Personal Injury Claim

There are often few, if any, witnesses to accidents at work and accounts of how they occurred may differ dramatically. As a case concerning an injured fairground worker showed, however, judges are adept at weighing up the evidence before reaching conclusions as to the most likely sequence of events. The worker suffered multiple injuries to his right foot when he fell 15-20 feet whilst working on a ride. His account was that he and a manager were standing on a wet handrail, attempting to free a…