In Employment Law Terms, Asperger’s Syndrome Can Be a Disability

A great many employers would agree that thinking differently is a positive advantage to those with Asperger’s syndrome and that they have much of value to contribute to the workplace. However, as one case showed, the condition may nevertheless be classified as a disability in employment law…

Nov 28, 2022

Julian hochgesang dkn8 zpibwo unsplash 1024x683

A great many employers would agree that thinking differently is a positive advantage to those with Asperger’s syndrome and that they have much of value to contribute to the workplace. However, as one case showed, the condition may nevertheless be classified as a disability in employment law terms.

After a man with a longstanding diagnosis of Asperger’s syndrome lodged an Employment Tribunal (ET) complaint against his telecommunications company employer, the question of whether he was disabled, within the meaning of Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, was considered as a preliminary issue.

Ruling on the matter, the ET noted that the man’s social interaction skills are affected by his condition. He has particular difficulty when meeting new people and his blunt and direct manner of speech can be misinterpreted as rudeness. His thinking, logic and decision-making skills are also affected and can make him appear stubborn, bringing him into conflict with others.

He further suffers anxiety and sleeplessness and can be intolerant to some sensory experiences, including certain noises or bright lights. Overall, the ET was satisfied that his condition has a substantial impact on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The statutory criteria for a finding of disability were therefore met.

Use of Discriminatory Words in the Workplace – Context Always Matters

Employers are entitled to enforce zero-tolerance policies in respect of discriminatory remarks in the workplace. As an Employment Tribunal (ET) ruling showed, however, a thorough investigation is always required prior to a dismissal, not least because words that may be utterly unacceptable in one context may not be in another. A sales manager with an otherwise blemish-free disciplinary record was summarily dismissed on grounds of gross misconduct on the basis that he had used the discriminatory…

Workplace Banter May Be Fine, But Not If it Tips Over Into Harassment

A certain amount of foul-mouthed banter is only to be expected in a robust working environment. As an Employment Tribunal (ET) ruling showed, however, employers who allow it to tip over into hostile and discriminatory abuse are likely to pay a high financial and reputational price. The case concerned a white worker, aged in his early 50s, who was employed by a tyre recycling company. He worked as part of a small team in which white people were in a minority. He said that a younger black…

Marital Discrimination – ET Failed to Ask the Right Question

To treat employees unfavourably because they are married amounts, unsurprisingly, to unlawful discrimination. However, as one case showed, proving a causal link between such treatment and marital status can be highly demanding. The case concerned a bookkeeper who was married to the principal shareholder of the company for which she worked. After their relationship ended in acrimonious divorce, she was dismissed by the company’s managing director (MD). An Employment Tribunal (ET) subsequently…