In Employment Law Terms, Asperger’s Syndrome Can Be a Disability

A great many employers would agree that thinking differently is a positive advantage to those with Asperger’s syndrome and that they have much of value to contribute to the workplace. However, as one case showed, the condition may nevertheless be classified as a disability in employment law…

Nov 28, 2022

Julian hochgesang dkn8 zpibwo unsplash 1024x683

A great many employers would agree that thinking differently is a positive advantage to those with Asperger’s syndrome and that they have much of value to contribute to the workplace. However, as one case showed, the condition may nevertheless be classified as a disability in employment law terms.

After a man with a longstanding diagnosis of Asperger’s syndrome lodged an Employment Tribunal (ET) complaint against his telecommunications company employer, the question of whether he was disabled, within the meaning of Section 6 of the Equality Act 2010, was considered as a preliminary issue.

Ruling on the matter, the ET noted that the man’s social interaction skills are affected by his condition. He has particular difficulty when meeting new people and his blunt and direct manner of speech can be misinterpreted as rudeness. His thinking, logic and decision-making skills are also affected and can make him appear stubborn, bringing him into conflict with others.

He further suffers anxiety and sleeplessness and can be intolerant to some sensory experiences, including certain noises or bright lights. Overall, the ET was satisfied that his condition has a substantial impact on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities. The statutory criteria for a finding of disability were therefore met.

Strife in the Workplace and Reasonable Adjustments – Guideline Ruling

Many employers behave creditably when coping with serious breakdowns in working relationships. As a guideline Employment Tribunal (ET) ruling showed, however, in such situations it is vital to pay very particular attention to the position of disabled employees whose mental health may be at stake. The case concerned a woman who suffered from anxiety and depression which it was agreed amounted to a disability. Following her resignation, she launched ET proceedings against her NHS trust employer,…

No Transfer of Vicarious Liability Under TUPE, High Court Rules

When a transfer of a business takes place to which the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (TUPE) applies, does any vicarious liability of the original employer to a third party for wrongdoing by an employee transfer to the new employer? The High Court has answered that question with a resounding ‘no’. A woman was seeking damages for wrongs suffered while she had been a hospital inpatient. She claimed that the company that had owned the hospital was responsible…

Causation Issue Stymies Assaulted Teacher’s Personal Injury Claim

Employers are required to perform risk assessments and to have policies in place to ensure the reasonable safety of their staff. As a Court of Appeal ruling concerning a pupil’s assault on a teacher showed, however, it can be very difficult to prove that breaches of such duties have caused you injury. The assistant headteacher suffered a fractured cheekbone and psychiatric injuries when the agitated pupil punched him in the face without warning. In the light of the boy’s deteriorating…