Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Caused Delay in Lodging Discrimination Claim

Disability discrimination claims that are filed outside a three-month statutory time limit will usually be dismissed without a hearing – but what if the disability itself is the cause of the delay? That issue was considered in a guideline case concerning a trainee pharmacist who was stricken by…

Feb 18, 2022

Tbel abuseridze ebw1nlfdzfw unsplash 1024x683

Disability discrimination claims that are filed outside a three-month statutory time limit will usually be dismissed without a hearing – but what if the disability itself is the cause of the delay? That issue was considered in a guideline case concerning a trainee pharmacist who was stricken by chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

The woman suffered from several long-term disabling conditions, including post-viral CFS. The condition was characterised by an overwhelming sense of fatigue and a chronic influenza-like malaise, typically worsened by physical or mental exertion. She was sometimes so unwell that she had to take to her bed for days.

She held a trainee position with an NHS trust for six months before she decided that she could no longer cope with the strain and resigned. She subsequently launched Employment Tribunal (ET) proceedings on the basis that reasonable adjustments had not been made to cater for her disability. She said that she was required to stand for extended periods and was not provided with a suitable chair.

Following a preliminary hearing, the ET noted that she had lodged her claim outside the primary three-month limitation period provided for in Section 123 of the Equality Act 2010. The delay was significant, but the ET found that it was just and equitable to extend time so that her case against the trust could proceed to a full hearing.

The ET acknowledged the serious physical and mental limitations arising from her lifelong condition. For about five months following her resignation she was simply too unwell to carry out necessary inquiries or to issue her claim. Once her health improved sufficiently, she took those steps promptly and at the first available opportunity. She was also permitted to proceed with her claim against two other public bodies involved in the training of pre-registration pharmacists.

Hotel Owner Ruled Liable Following Guest’s Fatal Fall from Window

Property occupiers are obliged to take reasonable care for the safety of their visitors, but does that duty extend to those who choose to take obvious risks? The Court of Appeal addressed that issue in a guideline case concerning a hotel guest who fell out of a window to his death. The man was staying on the hotel’s second floor after attending a wedding when he fell nine metres from the sash window in the early hours of the morning. His widow sought compensation from the hotel’s owner under…

Age Discrimination, Redundancy and the Burden of Proof – Guideline Ruling

Where an older employee is treated less favourably than a younger one in a similar position, the burden shifts onto the employer to prove that age discrimination had no effect on its decision-making. An Employment Tribunal (ET) made that point in the case of an administration manager who was made redundant at the age of 67. The man had worked for a car sales company for more than 20 years when he was selected for redundancy. He contended that his dismissal was pre-determined and motivated by…

Disability Discrimination by Association – Guideline EAT Decision

It may sound surprising, but you need not necessarily be disabled in order to suffer disability discrimination. As one case showed, it is legally possible for a non-disabled employee to suffer discrimination by association with a disabled colleague. A sales manager was recruited by a company’s sales and marketing director, who subsequently became disabled due to cancer. After both men were dismissed, the manager launched proceedings, asserting that he had been subjected to direct disability…