Allergy Rules Should Be Tightened for Restaurants, Says FSA

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is urging the government to make it compulsory for restaurants to print allergy information on menus, in a bid to better inform consumers and limit the risk of extreme allergic reactions.

There is currently no legal requirement for businesses to make…

Jan 24, 2024

Family restaurant meals on table 1024x819

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is urging the government to make it compulsory for restaurants to print allergy information on menus, in a bid to better inform consumers and limit the risk of extreme allergic reactions.

There is currently no legal requirement for businesses to make allergens known to customers in print, although FSA guidance recommends they do this.

In an effort to mobilise the hospitality sector into listing allergens on menus, the FSA now wants written information to be a legal requirement and conversations between staff and customers regarding allergens to be standard practice.

At present, food businesses are required by law to provide allergen information and follow labelling rules. The law says that they must provide allergen information to their customers, handle and manage food allergens effectively in food preparation, and tell customers if any food they provide contains any of the 14 allergens that are required to be declared as allergens by food law.

Tax Dodgers Beware – You May Be Sacrificing Your Employment Rights

Tax evaders rarely understand the potential consequences of their wrongdoing. That was certainly so in the case of two cab drivers who underdeclared their earnings to the tax authorities and, in doing so, came perilously close to sacrificing any claim they might have to employment rights. The drivers launched Employment Tribunal (ET) proceedings against a private hire company, complaining that they had not received holiday pay or work breaks. The company asserted, amongst other things, that…

Employment – The COVID-19 Chickens are Coming Home to Roost

Many businesses confronted by the existential crisis of the COVID-19 pandemic took swift steps to shed staff. However, as an Employment Tribunal (ET) ruling showed, the requirements of employment law were not suspended and, for those who failed to comply with them, the chickens are now coming home to roost. The case concerned a graphic designer who was made redundant a few days after the first lockdown came into force. His employer, a small company, experienced a precipitous decline in sales…

Logistics Operative Succeeds in Post-Termination Victimisation Complaint

Victimisation of workers does not necessarily come to an end with the termination of their employment. The point was made by the case of a logistics operative who was labelled a troublemaker by a member of his former employer’s senior management team. Whilst working for his former employer, the operative, who suffered from anxiety and depression, lodged a grievance and issued an Employment Tribunal (ET) complaint of disability discrimination. Both those steps were agreed to be protected acts.…