Acas Updates Code of Practice on Flexible Working

Following recent changes to the law and a consultation last year, the Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service (Acas) has updated its statutory Code of Practice on requests for flexible working, replacing the previous version published in June 2014.

From 6 April, employees have a…

Jun 12, 2024

From 6 April, employees have a right to request to work flexibly from the first day of their employment. Previously, employees only had this right once they had worked for their employer for at least 26 weeks.

The updated Code encourages employers to take a positive approach to working flexibly. Employers must handle every request for flexible working in a reasonable manner, and must agree to a request unless there is a genuine business reason not to. An employee must be consulted before their request is rejected.

It is important that employers ensure they comply with the Code, as any failure to do so can be taken into account by Employment Tribunals where relevant.

Acas also provides detailed guidance on flexible working requests to accompany the Code, including practical examples for employers and employees. The Code and the accompanying guidance can be found on Acas’s website.

Agency Workers Have No Right to Apply for Vacant Permanent Positions

Agency workers have a right to be informed by those who hire them of permanent positions that become vacant – but are they also entitled to apply for such posts? Following an important test case, the Court of Appeal has answered that question decisively in the negative. The case concerned a worker who was employed by an agency that was owned by, and provided staff exclusively to, Royal Mail in order to enable the latter to react to fluctuations in demand for labour. When permanent positions…

HMRC are Clawing Back Furlough Payments Made in Error

It will come as no surprise to hear that HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is making stern efforts to claw back sums paid in error under the COVID-19 furlough scheme. As one case showed, however, that process has left some reputable and entirely honest employers caught between a rock and a hard place. The case concerned two workers who started employment with a furniture company in late February 2020. Because they were taken on so late in the month, they were not paid for the first time until 26…

Disability Discrimination and Hypothetical Comparators – Guideline Ruling

Workplace disability discrimination claims often hinge on arguments that a disabled person was treated less favourably than a hypothetical comparator. As a guideline Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision showed, the circumstances that are imputed to such a comparator are, in many cases, of decisive importance. The case concerned a warehouse operative who was disabled by degenerative disc disease in her lower back. She was in near-constant pain and could not bend, walk or sit for more than…