Lost Your Job Due to the Pandemic? You May Have Been Unfairly Dismissed

If you are amongst the cohort of workers who have been made redundant in the wake of the pandemic and feel that you have been treated unfairly, you should contact a solicitor without delay. In one case, a bar manager who was sacked without notice received thousands of pounds in…

Nov 05, 2021

Bar shot glasses 1024x683

If you are amongst the cohort of workers who have been made redundant in the wake of the pandemic and feel that you have been treated unfairly, you should contact a solicitor without delay. In one case, a bar manager who was sacked without notice received thousands of pounds in compensation.

After several months on furlough, the 58-year-old man, who had been employed at a hotel for six years, was asked to return to work to prepare for reopening. A few weeks later, however, he received a letter out of the blue, stating that he was being made redundant with immediate effect. Despite attempting to contact his employer, he received no information about sums that he was owed.

After he took action, an Employment Tribunal (ET) noted that there was a genuine redundancy situation that provided his employer with a potentially fair reason for dismissing him. In upholding his unfair dismissal complaint, however, the ET found that the procedure followed was plainly deficient. The letter was dated two weeks before he received it, yet he was given no prior notice of the redundancy situation.

His dismissal also amounted to a breach of contract in that, although he was entitled to six weeks’ notice, he received none. The employer’s failure to pay him in respect of four days’ untaken leave was an unlawful deduction from his wages. The same was true of the failure to pay him for 28 hours worked and for two of the weeks he spent on furlough. The ET awarded him a total of £5,472 in compensation.

Allergy Rules Should Be Tightened for Restaurants, Says FSA

The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is urging the government to make it compulsory for restaurants to print allergy information on menus, in a bid to better inform consumers and limit the risk of extreme allergic reactions. There is currently no legal requirement for businesses to make allergens known to customers in print, although FSA guidance recommends they do this. In an effort to mobilise the hospitality sector into listing allergens on menus, the FSA now wants written information to be a…

Employers – Knee-Jerk Reactions to Fractious Situations Can Cost You Dear

When employees query the contents of their wage packets, terse conversations can ensue. As one case showed, however, knee-jerk reactions to such situations are a positive invitation to Employment Tribunal (ET) proceedings. The case concerned a hotel worker in her probationary period. She considered that her first payslip was about £1,000 short. She had been paid in accordance with the hotel’s payroll system, but that system had not been explained to her. Her initial reaction was to place a…

Employment and an Egregious Case of Pregnancy/Maternity Discrimination

Employers who discriminate against pregnant women or new mothers can expect to reap a bitter harvest of financial and reputational damage. An Employment Tribunal (ET) made that point in describing a woman’s suspension and dismissal whilst on maternity leave as one of the most egregious acts of discrimination possible. The woman’s boss viewed it as highly inconvenient when she and another employee became pregnant at roughly the same time and decided to engineer their departure. Not much more…